The bad days ahead

Where lost Modi’s Rishiman?

By Prof. Dr. Shastra Dutta Pant

Nepal is heading towards the end-result of the twelve-point New Delhi pact. Nepali commoners are unaware of the hidden meaning of the pact and the continuous two decade long ongoing exercises. It will not come into normal position, I guess, as the ill intentions are fulfilled. The present political exercises being practised in Nepal are highly fatal or I would say suicidal.

Since PM Modi visited Nepal and launched the new strategic behaviour dealing with neighbours was very positive. His Rishiman address to Nepal’s parliament had deeply touched the heart and mind of Nepali people. Since he visited lady chancellor of Germany, introduced himself as the representative of the Budha born country. Soon after, he visited China and signed an agreement to construct a road via Lipulek pass without consulting Nepal. While addressing Nepali parliament he had clearly stated that Kalapani area is a disputed one. These two things touched my mind ‘would India may come out of double standard principle since home minister Balav Bhai and PM Neharu’ as they were habituated with the culture of dominating others.

After a couple of weeks, Indian Home Minister Rajnath Singh, coming close to Nepal’s border Maharajganj, Bihar, said, “Although the Madhesi problem, is an internal issue of Nepal, the Indian government will protect the interests of the one crore Indians living there, Madhesis are Indians who had migrated to Nepal years ago. While many have received Nepali citizenship, the majority of them are still without a nationality…however, the BJP has been supporting the Madhesis for a long time.” (Daily mail online India). India is accused of providing logistic support to the movement of the Madhesis against the Nepal government since a pretty long time. All Nepali intellectuals and journalist must understand that all Madeshis residing in plain Tarai are the genuine son of the Nepali soil. They are not the Indian migrants as the Indian home minister claimed. Madhesis, who claim that the Nepal government deliberately ignores the Tarai area to relegate them is the language they express, no more than, coined by RAW and South Desk. The unethical and unnatural demand of one Madesh one Pradesh is also coined by those Indians, not by the Tarai people. It is to note that Tarai is Nepal’s only developed and prioritized area, compare to hills and mountain areas. Any unbiased researcher can make a detailed survey.

It is crucial at this point of time because the entire Tarai area of Nepal is caught in violent clashes due to those words of Indians and agents such as Girija who even amended the constitution and made a Citizenship Law to enter any Indian easily making a majority of them so that Nepal become next Sikkim in the long course of time.

Earlier, so-called Nepal experts Prof. Suka Dev Muni, General Mehata, ex-foreign secretary and ambassador to Nepal, Shyam Saharan, had met those activists and exited them. They had given the guidelines for unrest and provided them with the required financial and logistic support. Both Tharuwan and non-tharuwans are the outcome of their support.

At the same time, UN Secretary-General Baanki Moon had warned the government of Nepal through PM Sushil Koirala not to loose the so far gained outcomes. Clearly, he meant the secularism and the republicanism. Christian countries’ i.e. Union of the then EU Ambassadors’ met (undiplomatic delegation) PM Koirala, speaker of the parliament and communist leaders who were in relation to Banki moon. Prachand, Sherbahadur, Baburam and Khadga Prasad met with the Indians without the presence of the Nepali officials, has relation to this point directly or indirectly. General people say that they were taken there to judge to whom to make Lendup Dorji. Now, to this moment, they require to clarify themselves in front of the sovereign Nepali citizen.

It looks that the present drama in Nepal is the repetition, played during the time of 12 point Delhi Pact, in which the presence of missionaries, ambassadors, the Samuel Tamrat (as a UN envoy) was abnormal. Now, both the external forces are very much aware to insert their interests in the constitution. It seems that the amendment of the map of Nepal and the Kalapani issues are also drama as the PM Oli asked the education minister not to insert the amended map in the textbooks.

It is now clear that the 19 days long revolutionist had received one billion cash to collect the people inside the valley from all over Nepal. Presently the missionaries alone have allocated one billion for one day conference of the janjati related activities to insert the secularism in the constitution. They have mobilized 10 thousand people visiting door to door. Half of them are high school level students.

During the 2006 unrest, there were running two parallel currents for and against republicanism. Now the same types of currents are flowing for the sake of Bhutanization or Sikkimization. On the other hand, the missionaries had building pressure to PM Koirala, Subas Nembang, and Prachand and so on in favour of secularism. The dollar boosted party leaders are making tricky affairs that the secularism will be removed after the amendment of the forthcoming constitution soon after it is enforced. It is to note that there will be no two-thirds majority to amend the constitution even if the sayer is positive. The parliamentarian will be purchased, for the alien have no shortage of money. That is why Nepal is to keep poorer always.

It is now clear that the foregone struggles were for the aliens, by the aliens and of the aliens. The Nepalis were used as the mercenaries. The change made so far is not for Nepal. Nor, the change will give a positive and fruitful result to Nepalis in future. Those alien forces are rather answering Nepal’s protest on Kalapani, Sino-Indian treaty and the return of the Greater Nepal indirectly. It is now high time to explore and exhibit the hidden meaning of the alien change-forces by the intellectuals and the journalists. People should know the reality. They have to ask questions about why are not Christian or Muslim countries secular. Why the UK has remained as the Christian kingdom? I would like to request to all help save Nepal now to build a prosperous in near future. If Nepal’s identity is lost, what is the meaning of saving of minor’s identity? If Nepal’s national identity is lost what is the meaning of protecting ethnic identity? All identities are saved when all Nepalis are united saving each other; fighting each other will eliminate all the identities of all the ethnic groups. Converting into Christianity is mainly to create conflicts.

Why a country having 94.6 percent Hindu and supported by the 4 percent Nepali Muslims for the Hindu kingdom is ignored? I have a question what the westerners mean by democracy? Western democracy, I understand, will lead Nepal politically, economically, socially and Dharma into a deep ditch. Nepal’s bad days are ahead.

The writer can be reached at: dr.shastra.dutta.pant@gmail.com

People’s Review Print Edition